Richmond News RSS Feed


'We will keep fighting' - Twickenham Riverside campaigners' pledge


Campaigners have vowed to fight on in their bid to stop houses being built on Twickenham Riverside - despite the plans being shelved until next summer.

The Friends of Twickenham Riverside (Fotr) group said it would not stop campaigning against the council’s proposed scheme to build 32 houses and a river centre on the riverside site. Members also reiterated their belief that the site should be turned into public space.

Their pledge follows council leader Serge Lourie’s shock announcement that he would not sign the contract with developer Countryside Properties until he had seen its accounts for 2009. The accounts are not expected to be published until summer 2010.

The delay is likely to mean the controversial riverside plans will become a key issue on which the Liberal Democrats will fight the next local election, next May.

Fotr member Scott Naylor said: “Everyone’s just so pleased. You can see the relief just spreading through people’s faces when we tell them the news.

“It’s about the community moving forward now. We will fight right through the election.

“We have a lot of work to do to communicate with the community in more detail about the plans which the opposition have promised to back to restore the site to a full amenity space.”

Campaigners this week raised concerns over the financial standing of the developer after overdue accounts showed its parent company - Copthorn Holdings - had made a loss of £81.7m before tax for 2008. The company was also refinanced just weeks before the accounts were published, leading to further concerns.

However, a spokesman from Countryside said the refinancing had left the company in a stronger position.

He said: “By any conventional accountancy measure Countryside Properties’ parent company is entirely solvent and financially sound.

“This refinancing has restored the group's net assets to a very positive position (£110m).

“At the same time, substantial facilities have been retained for our ongoing development programme and the future cost of debt is significantly reduced, enabling the group to take advantage of the substantial landholdings under its control.”

Councillor Lourie this week pledged to get out into the community and is asking organisations to contact him if they would like to find out more about the redevelopment.

He said: “The administration and Countryside Properties continue to be committed to this scheme, which will end 30 years of dereliction of this key riverside site, will contribute to the regeneration of Twickenham and bring a range of community benefits, all at no capital cost to council taxpayers.

“I repeat my promise to go and speak to any organisation that is interested in the truth of what we want to do.”

If you would like to meet Coun Lourie, email cllr.slourie@richmond.gov.uk.

To find out more about Fotr visit friendsoftwickenhamriverside.org.uk

• What do you think? Let us know by email (gholt@london.newsquest.co.uk), phone the newsdesk on 020 8744 4271 or leave a comment below.

Comments(4)

Yvonne Hewett says...
10:57am Thu 29 Oct 09

The photo accompanying this story shows an anti-riverside
development protester holding a placard that said, "Environment Trust Makes
Riverside Bust".

This is yet another piece of misinformation from RUG members. The Environment Trust, as a charity, raises the majority of its own funding. It is actively working to improve, preserve and enhance the riverside, and to provide education on climate change and the challenges we face in the future.

Through its volunteering and educational programmes the Trust provides a range of services and opportunities that the council doesn't have the finance or the resources to supply. For example:

a. the courses on the environment for schools that Joe Pecorelli has been running for the past two years,

b. the hugely successful lectures on the Natural History of the Thames, with Sir David Attenborough,

c.. the ongoing and frequently muddy landscape volunteering

d.. the riverbed cleanups (on 7th November in Twickenham, 21st November in Richmond).

One of the Trust's main fundraising events is the Art Auction at York House on 5th November, with donations of many talented artists, ranging from local painters right up to senior members of the Royal Academy. (All are welcome;
viewing starts at 6.30.)

This is just part of the Trust's activities that make it such a positive benefit to the borough, and a real asset to the community that deserves whole-hearted support in its endeavours.

For more information, see the Environment Trust's website, www.environmenttrust
.co.uk and the River Centre website, www.rivercentre.co.u
k

Yvonne Hewett
Thames Eyot


Julie Hill says...
7:44pm Thu 29 Oct 09

I should like to assure Yvonne Hewett that RUG does not put out 'misinformation'. The photograph to which she refers was taken during a protest march in which many groups and individuals took part. Whether they are members of Richmond United Group or not is totally irrelevant.

Her examples of the good that the Environment Trust does are all very worthy, but again, not relevant to the issue.

FACT. In order to build a SHELL of a River Centre and to bring about some improvements that should be part of the Council's annual budget, Richmond Council insists it must sell off a large chunk of the land for exclusive private development.

Given Ms Hewitt's lengthy objection letter last time there was planning application to build houses on this site, I am surprised that she now supports a proposal for luxury homes and one that discriminates against those less fortunate.

There ARE alternative sites near the River for a River Centre to be located which could be utilised instead.

Finally, to set the record straight, Richmond United Group is NOT against the idea of a River Centre. What RUG does not support is the sale of land on this site for housing in order to achieve it.

ratcatcher says...
10:37pm Thu 29 Oct 09

Mrs. Hewett
As a member of RET I would like to see a more open approach to the Riverside site.
Surely with the expericence of the RET we could plan to aid the Riverside site be opened without major cost to residents.

I would like to offer £250 to the first skip to clear the site.
I think as a community group we should work together.

T: TOGETHER
E: EVERYONE
A: ACHIEVES
M: MORE

Scott Naylor says...
12:51pm Sun 1 Nov 09

I am a member of the Environment Trust for Richmond, founded 25 years ago by Honor Bailey who received an MBE no less for her contribution to the community. It is her work upon which are the core values which the trust have built up their reputation, not just the last five years of certain activists who have become less modest in their aspirations to be a 'National' River Centre, by exploiting the land on the Poolsite to further their own ambitions.

Let me be quite clear, the proposed River Centre albeit extremely ambitious is taking not only £2.5m, plus the additional £700,000 of council taxpayers money so far spent on this project, making an additional £3.2m taken out of the tax-payers pocket, before even a brick has been laid, which apparently 'won't cost the tax-payer a penny'.

In the normal world out there, money is counted in terms of good use, and opportunity cost of what that money might be spent on otherwise in terms of competitive forces, such as for instance, the site could have been cleared, and the fences could have been taken down giving the public access to the site after 125 years of LibDems trying to sell the site off.

Additionally, the site is realistically far too small for such a large building, and is complete over-massing, and these words come from professional Town planning Consultants.

Not only that, the development brief is criticised for not including 1 - 33 King Street, as per the NEF report, they are clearly missing out on the complete picture of connecting the town to the river and the river to the town.

if a River Centre were to be built, in order to make full use of the size, you would need a large park environment to maximise the inside/outside nature of the subject-matter - namely the natural outdoor environment.

So maybe the Environment Trust need to be looking for a two acre site of unfettered space in a relevant area and some substantial private donations from some of their patrons and LibDem friends to get this off the ground.

Destroying the glorious poolsite is clearly not one of these options though.


Keep fighting: Twickenham Riverside campaigners have vowed to continue their fight against controversial plans for the riverside redevelopment Keep fighting: Twickenham Riverside campaigners have vowed to continue their fight against controversial plans for the riverside redevelopment

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses