News RSS Feed


Richmond Park visitors give their verdict on parking charges

Visitors to Richmond Park today spoke out against the Government’s decision to charge them to park there.

Within hours of Culture Minister Margaret Hodge’s announcement that parking will cost up to £1 an hour in Richmond and Bushy parks, motorists shared their frustration with the Richmond and Twickenham Times.

An overwhelming majority of park users lashed out at the decision - mirroring the reaction from the public consultation last summer. Despite 84 per cent of respondents voicing their disapproval, parking fees are to be introduced later this year. However, their introduction is subject to parliamentary approval.

Cinnia Bermingham, 64, of Kings Road, East Sheen, said: “I am very anti the charges and I think it is totally unecessary. What about the families who can't afford to pay it?

“It is very difficult to use public transport to get here so how else will I be able to come? This is definitely going to effect my future use.”

Park regular Nita Hornsby, 88, from Kew, seethed: “I am appalled. I can't get to any other parks, so I will have to stop coming.

“I would prefer to make a donation than be charged for parking.”

Eighty-year-old Elizabeth Tarrant, who often travels from Woodstone to visit Richmond, said: “It's not good at all. I think it will diminish the cafe as most people who use this car park only come for an hour.

“This is an extra expense, especially for older people.

“Normally I would come twice a week, but I will stop coming and go to Epsom Downs instead.

“Surely there are other ways of making money?”

Under the plans, which MPs Vince Cable and Susan Kramer have promised to fight in the House of Commons, drivers in Richmond Park will pay an hourly £1 charge, with a maximum fee of £3, while visitors to Bushy Park will pay 50p for every hour. The maximum charge is £2 for a stay longer than three hours.

Kitt Peck, 70, of Wellside Gardens, East Sheen, said: “I feel total dismay. I normally come here once a week and I will still come, but it will have to be on foot instead.”

Victoria Hansen, who works in Kew, said: “It just goes to show that the Government and Margaret Hodge do not have any idea about how locals feel.

“Once again it's just running roughshod over people.”

“The Government and councils make enough out of parking schemes as it is.

“People living in the area should be given free parking in their own boroughs anyway, we all pay enough in taxes.”

Kew resident Teresa Hartley said she believed there were alternative charges that should have been introduced instead of parking fees.

She said: “I feel that the cars that drive through Richmond Park are those who should be charged.

“If there were a barrier at all entrances, all cars coming into the parks could pay £1.

“Anyone staying in the park for more than 30 minutes could get a refund at one of the car parks, if this was thought economic to operate.

“Since far more cars pass through the parks than stay in them, this would provide the income that they are obviously seeking.

“It would provide more than could be raised from parking alone. It might also deter some cars from using the park and thus decreasing pollution in the park.

“Even if the refund would be difficult to manage, a single charge of £1 for everyone would make more sense than the system they are suggesting.

“That system penalises only those who wish to enjoy the park not those who merely use it as a route to and from work, or just a pleasant shortcut.”

• What do you think? Let us know by emailing imason@london.newsquest.co.uk, phone the newsdesk on 020 8744 4262 or leave a comment below.

Comments(13)

SteveC1964 says...
6:37pm Fri 15 Jan 10

"Kitt Peck, 70, of Wellside Gardens, East Sheen, said: “I feel total dismay. I normally come here once a week and I will still come, but it will have to be on foot instead.” "

Brilliant, that's the idea. See, it's working already. If only more people would do the same as Kitt. Wellside Gardens is practically in Richmond Park. Much better to walk 5 minutes to get there.

Phillip Taylor says...
11:23am Sat 16 Jan 10

Steve is wrong. This charge just hurts the most vulnerable and frail in society who have little money as it is.

A LABOUR PARTY POLITICAL DECISION BY MS HODGE
The Labour Party should be ashamed of this decision which is similar in tyranny of the 10 p tax which Brown placed on the poor- so much for his socialist principles. I hope the park charge will be rescinded by a future government.

Phillip Taylor

TheParkie says...
12:21pm Sat 16 Jan 10

Those who have read my comments on earlier articles about this will already know my views!
--------------------
------------
It seems to me that later this year Richmond Park will have two wealthy and well-connected parliamentary candidates - Goldsmith and Kramer - who both had it well within their powers to avoid the introduction of charging by raising the cost of the renovations privately (as has been done for other facilities within the park) through their various networks but who preferred instead to use the topic for the scoring of cheap political points. They were asked and they did... nothing. The result is that their intended constituents will now have to pay parking charges in perpetuity for something they used to have for free. Incumbent and prospective MPs need to demonstrate that when things are tough on they can pull something special out of the bag. Despite being asked, neither of these people have done this and the constituents of Richmond Park and neighbouring constituencies will now pay the price. Those who believed that public opinion in a group of wealthy constituencies not known for being Labour strongholds or marginals would count for anything were naive beyond belief.

I have to say that the sight of these two individuals standing up and proclaiming their solidarity with other park users will be morally repugnant to me.
--------------------

------------
Lastly I point out that the charges in the inner London parks that do charge have doubled over the past 5 years. Visitors to Richmond Park can look forward to the same. It wouldn't surprise me if the first fee increase happens before the ticket machines are installed.
Those who have read my comments on earlier articles about this will know my views. It seems to me that later this year Richmond Park will have two wealthy and well-connected parliamentary candidates - Goldsmith and Kramer - who both had it well within their powers to avoid the introduction of charging by raising the cost of the renovations privately (as has been done for other facilities within the park) through their various networks, but who preferred instead to use the issue for the scoring of cheap political points. The result is that their intended constituents will now have to pay parking charges in perpetuity for something they used to have for free. Incumbent and prospective MPs need to demonstrate that when things are tough they can pull something special out of the bag. Despite being asked, neither of these people have done this and the constituents of Richmond Park and neighbouring constituencies will now pay the price. Those who believed that mere public opinion in a group of wealthy constituencies not known for being Labour strongholds or marginals would count for anything were naive beyond belief. I have to say that I would find the sight of these two individuals standing up and proclaiming their solidarity with other park users morally repugnant.
-------------------- ------------ Lastly I point out that the charges in the inner London parks that do charge have doubled over the past 5 years. Visitors to Richmond Park can look forward to the same. It wouldn't surprise me if the first fee increase happens before the first ticket machine is installed.

Joe 90 says...
4:42pm Sat 16 Jan 10

SteveC1964 makes a very good point. These are modest charges - about half the going rate for car parking in local town centres. And if it encourages more people to walk, cycle etc to the Park, and slightly fewer people to travel there by car then that can only be a good thing. This all rather reminds me of the controversy when Robin Hood Gate was closed to car traffic - but would anyone now seriously want to re-open this gate to car traffic? Of course not.
Car drivers will still be able to use and park in this beautiful Park but charges might encourage some alternative ways of visiting. And of course slighly lower car traffic volumes will benefit everyone including drivers who can never find a free parking space?
My friendly challenge to the objectors is this - leave your car at home for a change and walk to the park - you'll get fitter and be able to better appreciate the wonders of this park.

Julie Hill says...
8:17pm Sat 16 Jan 10

I love the way the low energy lightbulb fraternity keep suggesting alternative ways of getting to the parks.

Please do tell me how one transports a 32kg canine three miles to the Park? Oh and please don't tell me to walk it round the block instead.

Phillip Taylor says...
6:37pm Sun 17 Jan 10

Julie Hill is absolutely right with her posting because the issue is one of a lack of proportionality- something which Ms Hodge and her socialist friends keep banging on about when there is, in reality, no fairness to this charge- it hits the most vulnerable.

Joe 90, you are living in a parallel universe which does not take account of age or disability. So much for Harriet Harman's Equality legislation- it's one law for one set of people and the rest can go hang themselves.

I hope the Tories will reverse this decision....but I'm not going to hold my breath on this one!

Phillip Taylor

New Malden Man says...
7:27pm Sun 17 Jan 10

Maybe just charge on weekends, I have witnessed many motorists act like yobs when fighting over spaces in White Lodge car park. If you can afford to buy and run a car you can afford to pay.

torquerulesok says...
1:11pm Mon 18 Jan 10

What a mess: obviously Royal Parks have not thought this through... (or perhaps they have): people will still drive to Richmond Park and simply park outside the gates. Residents will then complain about not being able to park outside their own house. The councils will introduce residents' parking zones.

Result: not only do car-driving park visitors pay, residents living near Richmond Park will pay for an annual parking permit, too.

Better stop this in its tracks: there is a demonstration organised at Pembroke Lodge for 1030 on Saturday 30 January.

reesmf says...
2:25pm Mon 18 Jan 10

"This charge just hurts the most vulnerable and frail in society who have little money as it is."

Nonsense! Anybody who can afford to run a car can afford £3 to park it occasionally.

Sanity99 says...
6:31pm Mon 18 Jan 10

This is all so funny. I've got no great views either way. Sometimes I walk to Richmond and Bushy Parks, sometimes I go by bus, or train to Norbiton, Mortlake, Hampton, Teddington, Kingston or Richmond stations to get into the parks. Children go free on public transport, as do the elderly and dogs. 9 out of 10 dog owners say their dogs show no preference as to where they get walked.

The infirm will be able to park for free. There is other local parking at Bentalls, Tesco in Teddington, or at Hampton Court, although even when the inevitable price rises do follow, the park car parks will still be cheaper. Oh, and anyone who has a 3-mile drive to get to Bushy Park is at the centre of a 2-mile radius circle covering over 12 square miles. There are many areas much closer. And if a 32 kg dog (what's that in doggy pounds please?) isn't bus-friendly, it shouldn't be loose in a child-friendly park.

The only people who might be inconvenienced are those living very close to the park and might lose their beloved parking space occasionally. What a sad self-centric correspondence this is. Does a park of 1000 acres really even need a car park? It's only a ten minute walk to a gate.

And finally, the idea of a toll gate in the parks sounds positively Middle Aged. Where will it be, half way down Chestnut Avenue as an eyesore, or causing endless tailbacks at either end? You've got a lovely park, let's enjoy it rather than whinging. Leave the car at home and stop and smell the roses.

TheParkie says...
2:32pm Tue 19 Jan 10

I find that dog walkers in Richmond Park are most insistent that that is THE place they HAVE to walk their dogs. Occasionally we suggest to selected owners who persistently fail to control their animals that perhaps they should try one of the many other local open places which don't have deer (in the above example a 3 mile radius gives you some 28 square miles in which to empty your pooch's tanks) and are met with incredulity. Someone once told me that they couldn't possibly use Wimbledon Common because "it's full of loonies"! They clearly haven't been keeping their eyes open in RP...

Sadly RP does need its car parks (and sometimes their overspill areas). I'm not in favour of charging because it imposes an implicit entrance fee on something that was a customary right, but on other articles in this series I've instigated the "Margaret Hodge challenge" which is for one or more people to travel to Richmond Park by public transport (and back) for less than £3 in total. Sadly in the interests of fairness (i.e. to guarantee my winning) this challenge isn't open to holders of season tickets or concessionary tickets. No-one's beaten it yet.

martnal says...
4:06pm Tue 19 Jan 10

It sounds like Car Pay Diem, as the Romans used to say as they queued up to park their chariots instead of walking. I do love a bilingual pun...!

RiverLover says...
10:09am Wed 20 Jan 10

For those in Twickenham who are against the charges and intend to attend the rally on Jan 30th (10.30am Pembroke Lodge car park), would it be an idea if we went en masse. We could meet up and then walk to the park. For those who would need to get there by car perhaps a car sharing scheme in order not to cause congestion?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree