News RSS Feed


Train company looking to appeal Gunnersbury drunk passenger compensation

Gunnersbury station Gunnersbury station

A train company is considering lodging an appeal after a High Court judge ruled that a drunken student who fell in front of a train at Gunnersbury station had the right to claim a six-figure sum in compensation.

Paul Collins-Williamson, from Isleworth, toppled into a gap between the train and the platform as he drunkenly walked alongside the train, slamming on the windows and doing Ali G impressions.

His injuries were so severe his left leg was amputated and he lost fingers from his left hand after being dragged under the train as it left the station on June 11, 2003.

On Friday, Judge John Reddihough QC told Silver Link Trains Ltd that it held 50 per cent of the responsibility for Mr Collins-Williamson’s accident.

He ruled the company – which denied liability – failed to ensure a safer system to prevent such hazards was in place and the guard should have had an “openable” window in his carriage which would have allowed him to see if passengers were in trouble right up to the moment of departure.

He said: “In that regard it (Silver Link) failed to measure up to the appropriate standard of care and was negligent.

"The guard should have been checking the platform right up to the moment when he finally boarded the train, especially bearing in mind the gap at this station."

Mr Collins-Williamson, now 32, from Turnpike Way, had been fooling around on the platform when his legs gave way underneath him and he fell on to the track.

His fall unnoticed, the guard gave the signal for the train, despite onlookers attempts to stop it.

However, Judge Reddihough found Mr Collins-Williamson had to bear an equal portion of responsibility for the accident, for engaging in “foolhardy behaviour” when he was near the edge of the platform.

Hannah Rutterford, partner for solicitors Kester Cunningham John which brought the case to court on behalf of Mr Collins-Williamson said: “We got the best result we could have hoped for.

“If my client’s accident could have been prevented by better safety procedures then we need to ensure that all train operators have taken appropriate measures to minimise the risks and to maximise the guard’s ability to check that the track is clear, so that no one else suffers a similar fate. ”

It is believed the train operator’s instructing solicitors Weightmans are planning to lodge an appeal, although permission was refused at the trial.

Transport for London, which manages Silver Link Trains as part of London Overground, said it was not in a position to comment as the incident occurred prior to it taking over the firm.

Comments(4)

ric says...
9:16am Fri 14 Nov 08

whats happened to the world?

what happen to the days where you act like a muppit you pay the price.

how can you claim compensation for acting like a drunken idiot.

if i get tanked up on beer. run out into the m25 infront of a car. can i then sue the driver of the car for running me over?

we have turned into america. claims direct and all that.

gertrude grendal says...
9:57am Fri 14 Nov 08

It would be better if bus drivers who start teh bus before passengers were seated, were fined heavily, and teh bus companies made to pay damages to passengers. But of course, only the drunk and criminal receive anything in this sick culture.

Jump-4-Joy says...
10:06pm Fri 14 Nov 08

how many of us have got drunk and got a train or bus home and somehow got there safely? All trains should have guards who should look out for people coming home drunk.
Anyone who has been to gunnersbury knows the gap is ernormous between the platform and train.
And the platform is curved.
I am not saying that drunks should get compensation but what if it was a child or old age pensioner who slipped.All curved platforms should have safety measures put in place and extra staff put on late night trains.
No one deserves to lose a leg espically if it could have been avoided

pied piper says...
12:41pm Sat 15 Nov 08

We use public transport to get home after we have gone out and had a good night? Some people obviously worse for wear.
Imagine all the drunks getting into their cars and driving home? not a good scenario.So we use PUBLIC TRANSPORT. The guard, The train driver all have a responsibility to protect their passengers. This obviously was not done otherwise how could a train leave a station thinking it was all clear and safe, When in fact somebody had fallen on the rails, With members of the public trying to help him up.
The question WE NEED TO ASK IS, where was the guard actually looking, did he actually look at the platform at all before he blew the whistle.I presume that this happened late at night where the people on duty should be more vigilant and aware that 'drunk' passengers are more likely to be using the service. absolutely disgusted that they are appealing.The accident could have been avoided if proper safety procedures were in place.The station is on a bend and the gap is huge between platform and train. The young man has to live with this for the rest of his life.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree