Ironical isn't it, if a Christian UK citizen wrote lyrics demanding the death of Moslems, they would be tried under the easier to prosecute crime of racism, and receive a long prison sentence. This proves how corrupt this country has become. One rule for them, and the rest of us can go to h*ll!

Try writing a song advocating murdering moslems, and you will quickly be prosecuted under the race hate laws, and find yourself in prison for a very long time.

Thats because we haven't just been shipped over here. We have no rights in our own country anymore do we because we dont want to offend any one else.
Like banning St Georges Day!! Who are we offending? Everyone else can celebrate Divali, Eid, Christmas, Chinese New year, St Patricks Day with open arms but god forbid we celebrate our own day!

It was really headline-catching for the article to mention the lyrics and clearly that's blinded the readers commenting above. She wasn't found guilty of writing offensive poems, it was for:
"collecting information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism."
If you're going to moan about anything, why not concentrate on whether she should have been released despite being a danger to society.

Also who has been 'shipped' over to the country since slave times? Your language is clearly confused and you're just adding to the general nonsense phrases used when talking about this issue.

I would like to know what rights you think you've lost as a result of immigration - you think St Georges day has been banned? It still happens - it's just not celebrated with an actual holiday or feast day (hasn't since the 18th century).

No doubt this person will now receive benefits as she is out of work. Like Abu Qutada, who cannot be deported to Jordan for fear that he will get what he deserves, she will live like a parasite off the tax payers. Maybe she should apply for a job as a pole dancer or hairdresser, like that other miserable character in the papers. With a favourable magistrate (and they usually are) she should get at least £4,000.

"But yesterday, Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Mr Justice Goldring and Mr Justice Plender, said the court found there was "a very real danger that the jury became confused and that the prosecution have rightly conceded that this conviction is unsafe"."

Excuse the ignorancy on the issue but that paragraph doesnt say a whole lot on what was considered weak in the conviction to quash it. However, writing messages of sypathy in regard to bin Laden and the terrorist movement is a commitment within the offence she was convicted of.

If she is out of work now, why would she received benefits? Did the conviction rob her of the opportunity and freedom to seek work? The JobCentre will be all too happy to supply her with employment.

I stand corrected Mr. Felts. This lady will no doubt be offered employment in the civil service, then she can 'lose' sensitive data to her heart's content.

Waldopepper asks “I would like to know what rights you think you've lost as a result of immigration”

Waldopepper, I will assume that you are a native Briton, and that you just haven’t quite grasped what is going on in Britain (and the rest of Europe for that matter).

Immigration itself is an attack on the rights of Britain’s native people by our own selfish elites (power-hungry internationalists all): we never asked for it, and we are demonised if we protest. What you are seeing is an indigenous people having their homeland taken from them. Oh, but we are still 90% of the population the complacent will say. And soon, ‘we are still 80%’. Then 70, 60, 50, 40, 15 ... How can it be otherwise as long as we continue along our present path?

Of course, I could tell you about Abigail Howarth, banned from applying for a civil service training programme for being English, or Codie Stott, put in a prison cell for asking to be put in a group in school with some girls who actually spoke English, or the prison service offices that we moved from Corby because the town was not ‘diverse’ enough (eg, too white) or the SOAS student made to apologise for holding an “English” party.

But it can take more than this before people start to join the dots. I know this – it’s taken me years.

So Lord Chief Justice Phillips, fears the jury would "be confused" as Mr Felts points out. The only confusion is in the judgement of Lord Phillips and his colleagues. His usual judgement in favour of criminals and against the public.